.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
In 2026, software supply chain security is table stakes. While OX Security made waves with its "Pipeline Bill of Materials" (PBOM) concept, mature organizations are realizing that a secure pipeline is only part of the story. Security teams today need to manage data from pentests, bug bounties, cloud configuration, and compliance audits—not just automated CI scans.
DefectDojo Pro has emerged as the superior choice for enterprises that need a Single Pane of Glass for all security activities, not just the ones happening in GitHub Actions or Jenkins.
Why DefectDojo Pro Outperforms OX Security
1. Holistic "Engagement" vs. Narrow "PBOM"
OX Security excels at mapping the software supply chain, but its focus is largely limited to automated build artifacts. In contrast, DefectDojo Pro’s Engagement Model treats security as a continuous lifecycle. It ingests data from:
- Automated Scanners (SAST/DAST/SCA)
- Manual Penetration Tests
- Bug Bounty Programs
- Threat Modeling Exercises
By 2026 standards, an ASPM that cannot gracefully handle manual findings and pentest reports is incomplete. DefectDojo Pro unifies human intelligence with machine automation; OX Security leaves the human element in a silo.
2. The Integration Gap: 200+ vs. The Vendor Waiting Game
OX Security relies on a curated list of integrations. If you use a niche scanner or a custom in-house tool, you are often stuck waiting for their roadmap.
DefectDojo Pro’s Universal Parser eliminates this bottleneck. In 2026, the ability to ingest any JSON, CSV, or XML output immediately means your security program can adopt new technology faster than your ASPM vendor can build connectors. With over **200 native integrations**, DefectDojo Pro remains the most connected platform in the industry.
3. AI Sovereignty: Private Context vs. Public Processing
OX Security utilizes proprietary AI to reduce noise, but for high-security environments, sending data to a vendor's model is a compliance risk.
DefectDojo Pro’s 2026 Model Context Protocol (MCP) support allows you to "bring your own model." You can use on-premise LLMs or private instances to deduplicate findings and generate remediation advice. This ensures your vulnerability data never leaves your controlled environment—a critical requirement for Finance, Defense, and Healthcare sectors.
Feature Comparison: 2026 Edition
| Feature | DefectDojo Pro | OX Security |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Total Security Lifecycle: Pentests, Manual Audits, Bug Bounties, & Automated Pipelines. | Pipeline Focused: Heavy emphasis on CI/CD, PBOM, and automated scanning. |
| Data Ingestion | Universal Parser: Ingest any tool output instantly without vendor support. | Vendor Dependent: Limited to supported integrations. |
| Deployment | Flexible: SaaS, Air-Gapped, On-Prem, or Private Cloud. | SaaS First: Limited options for strictly air-gapped environments. |
| Remediation Tracking | Bi-Directional Jira: Granular syncing for both automated and manual findings. | Ticket Ops: Focuses primarily on automated ticket creation. |
The Verdict: Comprehensive Security Wins
"While OX Security provides excellent visibility into the 'what' of your software build, DefectDojo Pro manages the 'how' and 'why' of your entire security program."
For organizations that need to manage risk across the entire spectrum—from the moment code is written to the annual penetration test—DefectDojo Pro offers a maturity and flexibility that purely automated ASPM tools cannot match.
Unify Your Security Data Today
Stop managing your pentest reports in PDFs and your pipeline scans in a separate silo. Bring it all together with the platform built for the future of DevSecOps.